Despite some reservations based on the Countdown to Darkness comics, resistance was futile. My Trek-loving big fella and I lounged at the luxury theater this afternoon, flipped on the 3D glasses, and beheld the new Trek.
Star Trek Into Darkness, Paramount
Based on a Book?
Eight years old and up. While Iron Man 3 (sorry, haven’t had time to write it up) is also PG-13, I wouldn’t take my young guy to see that one. I would this. I would say the violence is actually more Star Wars-like than the 2009 Trek, with only one real scene worthy of note (see spoilers below).
Good for Grown Ups?
Yes. Grab the popcorn.
Spoilers for Younger Kids
When Benedict Cumberbatch’s bad guy gets to the bridge of the other ship, he pulls the old squeeze the skull ‘till it cracks trick on one of the crew. The crack is offscreen, but it might be considered too intense for younger viewers. The Enterprise gets pummeled and, just like in the first, we see people sucked into space. Screams, but bloodless and not all that traumatic in the greater scheme of things (unless you’re that crewman, of course).
Quickie Plot Synopsis (Light Spoilers)
On a survey mission of a primitive planet, Kirk and Spock both knowingly break the Prime Directive to save an indigenous people—and Spock himself—from a planet killing volcano. They are greeted back at Starfleet with scorn. Kirk is demoted, Spock is transferred, and team Enterprise seem destined to be broken apart.
But a mysterious figure engineers series of terrorist events, starting in London and then tearing at the heart of Starfleet Command itself that leaves no choice but to put Kirk back in command as they hunt down the mysterious John Harrison.
The manhunt takes them to Qo’noS (Pronounced “Kronos”), the Klingon homeworld, where Harrison inexplicably and single-handedly saves the landing party from attack, and then surrenders himself. We find out that Harrison is not his real name, and that he may well not end up being the true, or at least only, villain in this affair. Indeed, the greatest threat may lie within…
My Review (Heavier Spoilers, but I’ll let you know when)
I’ve been pretty clear I had reservations about this movie, but I felt I went into it at the end pretty open. I saw the high fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes, saw a number of good reviews, and remembered that a lot of people really missed the “Star Trek” within the 2009 film. JJ and company gave me a good ride a few years back. I was ready to strap in again.
There were a number of things to like about this film. Most notably and centrally, this was a story about the coming together of Kirk and Spock. As a Trek Nerd, I was disappointed that McCoy was once again relegated to a supporting role as they have obviously decided that it is Kirk and Spock that is most important. Zachary Quinto does a wonderful job as Spock, and while Pine’s Kirk is very different from Shatner’s, I found myself not minding the change.
That’s big and carries this film. But, frankly, most of the rest of this movie doesn’t work very well. In 2009, JJ and company had the challenge of trying to reboot Trek while staying true to Trek cannon. I think that actually challenged them to write a cohesive story that, while not perfect (uh, the 2nd lightning storm in space never should have happened) did have a resonant and understandable beginning, middle, and end. The whiz-bang special effects seemed to be in service of the story.
On the other hand, this film absolutely felt like the plot was servicing the action. Motivations were glossed over to hurry to the next fight. The intrigue felt rushed because they wanted to make sure things were moving along. And other than Kirk and Spock with a bit of a mix of Uhura, the interrelations among the characters, both friends and enemies, felt cold. The jokes of this film felt like a thin retread of what they did in the first.
The plot itself also lacked punch, and was a huge mistake. Last time ‘round, we had a massive, nasty looking ship from the future tearing through entire fleets, planets, and almost destroying Earth itself. From the bad guy’s ship to the aims of the bad guys, everything here felt smaller. Indeed, it really worked against itself because having bigger effects for a smaller story really took away from making their larger scale more impressive.
[HERE COME THE SPOILERS] But, if I’m to say where this movie truly went wrong, it was in trying to borrow from the best of all the original films, Wrath of Khan. As most of you might know by now, John Harrison is actually Khan, and the eventual showdown between Khan’s ship and the Enterprise forces Kirk to sacrifice himself in almost the exact way Spock does in Trek II (don’t worry, they bring him back, completing the parallel).
Well, if you’re going to decide to tell in some ways a parallel tale to the best of all the Trek movies, you damned well better deliver. And in this, Into Darkness failed on pretty much all counts. I will grant you that Benedict Cumberbatch is a superior overall actor to Ricardo Montalbán, but give me the latter’s Khan any day. Indeed, given this is supposed to be one-in-the-same, I had a very hard time buying that even with the changes to the timeline, this could be the same person. And Montalbán’s delicious, charismatic evil was incredibly engaging, while this Khan was nothing but a distant, calculating killing machine. You never really felt his motivation or his pain. He was cool, but left me cold. To me, it was an absolute waste of a brilliant actor. It would have been much smarter had his character been someone else, as there really wasn’t a need for the Khan connection. As with everything else in this plot, it felt as forced as the 2009 felt organic.
The Trek II connection also brought out the gaping holes in Into Darkness’ story. While Wrath of Khan beautifully integrated the Genesis device, a moral challenge of galactic consequences into a more simple story of revenge, all of the “Trekisms” of this film feel tacked on. Just because you have a terrorist attack, for example, that doesn’t really make it a commentary on terrorism unless you make it connect to something resonant in our lives. Into Darkness really doesn’t even really try to do that. Instead it gives you a few throw-away lines and a convoluted connection to attacking the Klingons that seems utterly divorced from modern events. At the end of the day, this is Wrath of Khan with a lobotomy. [END SPOILERS]
There’s enough to like here to be worth the Trek, but there could have been so much more. I’m delighted this film will be successful, and even more so because JJ is headed over to Star Wars. For they now have Trek set up to boldly go where this film should have gone in the first place.
Overall Score: A soft 3 out of 5 stars