Finally, a chance to give my feedback on Peter Jackson’s efforts to turn one little book into three big movies. I saw this at a theater in 3D but on the standard 24 frames per second format. So I cannot speak to how the ultra-clear 48fps looked. You can check out the book review in my Read It Then See It post.
The Movie
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Warner Brothers, New Line.
Based on a Book?
Yes: The Hobbit, or There and Back Again, by JRR Tolkien, originally published in 1937
Genre
Children’s Fantasy
Age Appropriate
Eight years old and up. While the book is appropriate for younger children, I felt the film mirrored the tone and violence of Jackson’s LOTR films. I personally would not have been comfortable taking my child to see it until I felt he was ready for at least The Two Towers, which was for me this past year, when he turned eight. My sister took her son, who is six, and they both loved it and had no issues.
Good for Grown Ups?
Yes. While I’ll get to what I see as flaws in this film later, this is really designed for a more mature audience despite coming from a children’s book.
Spoilers for Younger Kids
I often feel that it is the specter that is more frightening than the monster. In that way, perhaps the most frightening scene in the film is when Gandalf tells the story of another wizard only mentioned in the book, Radagast the Brown. While in his home attempting to revive an injured animal, he comes under attack from unknown creatures scuttling around the outside. As it turns out, these are giant spiders we will see in future installments, but Radagast is able to send them away with only their hind quarters being seen as they retreat. So especially for any of you who have read the book but don’t know it’s coming in the movie, this may be a good time to let your child know that not only will the wizard prevail, but you don’t even really see the spiders (at least not yet). Also, Azog the one-armed Orc warlord is a pretty freaky and frightening piece of CGI.
Quickie Plot Synopsis
We begin with the fall of the great dwarf city of Erebor by the dastardly Dragon Smaug, and the rise of its heir, Thorin Oakenshield. With the assistance of wizard Gandalf the Grey, here begins a quest to retake what has become the Lonely Mountain. Much to the surprise and skepticism of dwarf, elf, and wizard alike, Gandalf has chosen a little hobbit, Bilbo Baggins, to serve as the party’s thief. At Gandalf’s urging, Bilbo reluctantly leaves the comfort of Bag End to join the dwarves on this adventure.
The group is almost immediately beset by danger, from hungry trolls to vicious goblins. After being lost in a Goblin’s cavern, Bilbo stumbles on a creature called Gollum, and a simple but attractive gold ring. He tricks Gollum into helping him escape with the added aid of that magical invisibility ring. Bilbo uses the ring to great effect, saving Thorin and with Gandalf’s help escaping to within sight of the Lonely Mountain. But something wicked has just awakened in the mountain, and will be awaiting them with fire and desolation…
My Review
So let me start out by saying that I enjoyed this movie. The acting was superb and I, for one, really did not find the many additions from the books, from Radagast to the White Council to the significant expansion of the story of the Necromancer, to have taken away from the story. Indeed the significant expansion of Gandalf’s character from a clearly supporting role in the book to a very central figure throughout was, I believe, an excellent choice.
The issue with this movie for me is that it felt very much a “square peg/round hole” effort. Jackson is essentially attempting to use The Hobbit as the glue that holds a larger story together that connects this tale directly to his fantastic LOTR films. In doing so, he replicates the same brooding, serious tone of his other films. Indeed, An Unexpected Journey in many ways feels even more serious than Fellowship of the Ring, as the frivolity feels more sporadic, less organic and, frankly, more annoying with the band of dwarves than it did with Merry and Pippin as well as Gimley providing some needed relief to the dire circumstances.
Frankly, this story, even with Jackson’s embellishments (which, credit where credit is due, is all derived from source materials) is simply not epic enough, feeling more like a thin version of his epic trilogy. The Hobbit is a children’s fairy tale, even after Tolkien edited the book after writing the trilogy to make it more consistent. In Jackson’s desire to make these films feel absolutely contiguous with his first trilogy, I believe he has robbed that sense of mirth and fun and replaced it with a grandiosity that is simply not supported by the plot.
What we end up with is an enjoyable, but very bloated piece of filmmaking. I also found that, unlike LOTR, the CGI effects became distracting, especially in the goblin cavern where the combat looked like a medieval version of Attack of the Clones. And there came a point when Gandalf said “RUN!” for the 6th time that I felt like I wasn’t watching a plot develop, but a video game on a loop. I found Fellowship of the Ring the strongest of the three LOTR films, and then while they were still wonderful, each became more flawed as the series progressed. I’m just hoping I’ll be able to say the reverse of The Hobbit trilogy.
Overall Score: 3 out of 5 stars
See It Then Read It
All said, I think there is a LOT to be said for seeing this first and then reading the book. My sister has been doing this with my nephew, and both of them have been having a great time finding the references in the book that Jackson used as cues to expand upon. Indeed, in the end there may be something to be said for those that are hot Rings nerds to hold off on the book until you’ve seen all the films.